Skip to content

A comparative study between recepient site preparation using dermabrasion, liquid nitrogen induced blister and dermarolling system in autologous non cultured epidermal cell suspension procedure in stable vitiligo patients

A comparative study between recepient site preparation using dermabrasion, liquid nitrogen induced blister and dermarolling system in autologous non cultured epidermal cell suspension procedure in stable vitiligo patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/12/016735
Enrollment
36
Registered
2018-12-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L80- Vitiligo

Interventions

Intervention1: Recipient site preparation by dermabrasion followed by NCES : 1. The recipient site will be shaved, cleaned with betadine and surgical spirit and anaesthetized with mixture of 2% lignoc

Sponsors

Post graduate institute of medical education and research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of generalized vitiligo 2. Patients with symmetrical lesions of size > 1.5cm x 1cm present on trunk or extremities including acral areas. 3. Vitiligo lesions has been stable for 1 year. 4. Disease not responding to medical treatment, or there are residual patches (after medical therapy) of vitiligo . 5. Maximum size of vitiligo patches to be selected for surgery will not be >100cm2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age less than 18 years 2) Pregnancy and lactation 3) Patient with actively spreading vitiligo 4) History of Koebnerisation 5) History of hypertrophic scars or keloidal tendency 6) Bleeding disorders 7) Patients with unrealistic expectation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the difference in extent of repigmentation by the three different methods at 12 weeks of post treatment follow up in a given patient of stable vitiligo. Repigmentation will be assessed as follows: â?¤25% Minimal repigmentation 26-50% Mild repigmentation 51-75% Moderate repigmentation 76-90% Marked repigmentation 90% Excellent repigmentation Timepoint: To assess the difference in extent of repigmentation by the three different methods at 8 days,4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks of post treatment follow up in a given patient of stable vitiligo.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the color matching of repigmented area.Timepoint: Colour matching of repigmented skin is assessed as â??somewhat lighter thanâ??, â??same asâ?? or â??somewhat darker thanâ?? normal skin;To assess the patient satisfaction (patient global assessment) and to compare the quality of life assessement post procedure with that of pre procedure.Timepoint: Assessment done pre procedure and at 12 weeks;To assess the pattern of repigmentation attained post-procedure.Timepoint: The repigmentation pattern obtained post procedure will be noted as â??diffuseâ??, â??perifollicularâ?? or â??migrating from the bordersâ?? at 8 days,4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks.;To compare the effect of recipient site preparation on acral vs non-acral areas.Timepoint: To assess the difference in extent of repigmentation by the three different methods at 8 days,4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks of post treatment follow up in acral and non acral areas in a given patient of stable vitiligo.;To monitor adverse events if anyTimepoint: At Recipient site : infection, milia, scarring and rejection. At Donor site : infection, milia, scarring, hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation at 8 days,4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrDavinder Parsad

Post graduate institute of medical education and research

parsad@me.com9876060361

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026