FindTrial
Sign In

A Study To Compare two supraglottic devices for blind intubation

A Study To Compare Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway With Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask For Blind tracheal Intubation Using Parker Flex Tip Tube.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/12/016682
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-12-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Blind tracheal Intubation: Blind tracheal intubation through Air-Q using parker flex tip tube. Control Intervention1: Blind tracheal intubation: Blind tracheal intubation through Ambu A

Sponsors

Department of anaesthesiology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients having 1.Respiratory or pharyngeal pathology 2.Restricted mouth Opening( 3.Body mass index ( >35kg/m2) 4.Gastroesophageal reflux disease, upper GIT surgery or pathology 5.Surgery in position other than supine will be excluded from study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of blind tracheal intubation through Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway versus Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask using Parker flex tip tube.Timepoint: Once - At the time of intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of attempts, Ease and insertion time for intubationTimepoint: Once - at time of intubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSomesh

Pt B D Sharma PGIMS Rohtak

Dr.jatinlal@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026