Health Condition 1: H25-H28- Disorders of lens
Conditions
Interventions
Control Intervention1: Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic intraocular lens will be compared: Hydrophobic (Supraphob BBY) compared with Hydrophilic acrylic ( Acryfold ) intraocular lenses for visual outcome a
Sponsors
Dr Arokiam John Bosco
M/S Appasamy Ocular Devices (P) Ltd.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Cataract amenable to phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens implantation Patients with clinically diagnosable cataract Patient willingness to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with visual loss not due to cataract Patients with anterior and posterior segment pathology Patients with clinical conditions were foldable lenses will be contraindicated eg uveitic cataract patients below fifty and above seventy five years Patients not willing to participate in the study and with poor compliance
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the safety and efficacy of single piece yellow tinted hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (supraphob Bby) with hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (Acryfold) following cataract extraction in adults. 1. To compare visual outcome by visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and refractive stability, for measuring efficacy. 2. To compare adverse events, glare, posterior capsular opacification, for measuring safety parameters. 3. To compare patient satisfaction.Timepoint: After implantation post operative follow up will be performed on Day1, Day3, Day7, Day 30(firstmonth), Day 60(secondmonth), Day 180(sixth month)and Day360(post operative one year follow up) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| to compare visual and clinical performance of both the intraocular lensesTimepoint: follow up over a period of two years | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Arokiam John Bosco
Indira Gandhi Government General Hospital and Post Graduate Institute puducherry
Outcome results
None listed