FindTrial
Sign In

A study to Compare ILMA and AIR-Q for intubation using Parkers tube.

A study to evaluate and compare Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway and AIR-Q for intubation using Parker flex tip tube.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/11/016466
Enrollment
110
Registered
2018-11-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Blind tracheal intubationm: Blind tracheal intubation through Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway using Parker flex tip tube. Control Intervention1: Blind tracheal intubation: Blind trache

Sponsors

Department Of Anaesthesiology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients belonging to American Society Of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient having 1.Respiratory or pharyngeal pathology 2.Restricted mouth opening(less then 2.5cm) 3.Body mass index more then or equal to 35 kg/m2 4.Pregnancy 5.Suspected difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of blind tracheal intubation through Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway versus AIR-Q using Parker flex tip tube.Timepoint: Once-at time of intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of attempts,ease and insertion time for intubation.Timepoint: Once-at time of intubation.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHimani

Pt.B.D.Sharma PGIMS Rohtak

drhimanimittal@gmail.com9466526302

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026