FindTrial
Sign In

a study to compare two diffrent things by applying a collar around neck

A study to compare Airtraq and McCoy Laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with simulated immobilized cervical spine

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/11/016454
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-11-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Comapring intubation by Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscope: Comapring intubation by Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscope by applying philadelphia cervical collar Control Intervention1: Comapring

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology Pt B D Sharma PGIMS Rohtak
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-III physical status undergoing surgical procedure requiring intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients having anticipated difficult intubation Full stomach patients requiring rapid sequence intubation BMI > 35 Kg/m2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation Time Modified Cormack and Lehane grading scale Percentage of glottic opening score (POGO) IDS(Intubation Difficulty Scale) First attempt success rate Number of attempts CompictainsTimepoint: Intubation time—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
hemodynamic monitoringTimepoint: 1 sec 3 sec 5 sec—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPradeep Kumar Moolchandani

PGIMS ROHTAK

pk.pgims@yahoo.com9416336901

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026