Intraoral device insertion condition comparison in children.

Optimal Condition for Supralaryngeal device insertion determined by trapezius squeeze test vs jaw thrust in spontaneosly breathing children.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/11/016446

Enrollment

Registered

2018-11-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Intra oral Insertion of supralaryngedevices: Adequate depth of anesthesia will be compared by two methods jaw thurst and trapezius squeeze test and there after supralaryngeal device ins

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 ASA grade I and II 2 Age 2-8yrs 3 Either gender 4 Surgical procedures â?? general surgery, urosurgery, paediatric surgery, orthopaedic surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Children having recent URTI 2 Previous h/o malignant hyperthermia 3 Anticipated difficult airway, restricted mouth opening 4 H/o regurgitation, pathology of oropharynx, neck & upper GIT

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Assessment of the supralaryngeal device insertion conditionTimepoint: Starting of inducion of anesthesia upto successfully insertion of supralaryngeal device.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To check -Duration of attempt -number of attempt -failed attempt -change over to other devices -ComplicationsTimepoint: From premedication upto 15mins post operatively.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrSmita R Engineer

Department of anesthesia,civil hospital , Ahmedabad

seng_90@yahoo.com

Outcome results