Skip to content

A comparative evaluation of fibreoptic bronchoscope and C- MAC D blade videolaryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients of oropharyngeal carinomas under general anaesthesia.

Nasotracheal intubation in patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas under general anesthesia:A comparative evaluation between fibreoptic bronchoscope and C-MAC D blade videolrayngoscope.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/11/016283
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-11-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C039- Malignant neoplasm of gum, unspecified Health Condition 2: C009- Malignant neoplasm of lip, unspecified Health Condition 3: C109- Malignant neoplasm of oropharynx,unspecified Health Condition 4: C148- Malignant neoplasm of overlappingsites of lip, oral cavity and pharynx Health Condition 5: C068- Malignant neoplasm of overlappingsites of other and unspecified parts of mouth

Interventions

Intervention1: C- MAC VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE: C- MAC VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPEWITH A D BLADE IS A TYPE OF VIDEIOLARYNGOSCOPE WHICH IS USED FOR INTUBATION IN DIFFICULT AIRWAY.THE TECHNIQUE WILL BE COMPARED WITH FL

Sponsors

AIIMS NEW DELHI
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) Adult patients less than 70 years. b) Clinical diagnosis of primary oro-pharyngeal cancer posted for surgery. c) ASA I and ASA II patients. d) Gave written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a) The presence of predictors of difficult bag and mask ventilation (presence of beard, obese with BMI >35, snoring, edentulous, intraoral tumors, receding chin etc.) and intubation, including decreased inter-incisor distance ( b) Patient refusal to participate in the study c) ASA III or more d) Patients with contraindication of nasal intubation (suspected epiglottitis, midface instability coagulopathy, suspected basilar skull fractures, apnea or impending respiratory arrest, large nasal polyps, suspected nasal foreign bodies, recent nasal surgery, upper neck hematoma or infection, history of frequent episodes of epistaxis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the total time required for successful intubation (total time from passage of the device into the oral cavity (Group D) and nostril (Group F) till first appearance of regular capnograph waveform).Timepoint: time for successful intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare the percentage of glottis opening (POGO) obtained in both the groups. 2. To evaluate the ease of NTI with the two techniques of intubation by modified nasal intubation difficulty scaling (NIDS) Timepoint: Difficulty of intubation will be done by NIDS scoring in the operation theartre.Percentage of glottis opening will be an objective finding visualised on camera screen

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAbhishek kumar

AIIMS

abhishekk73102@gmail.com8874442998

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026