Skip to content

TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OFINTRAOPERATIVE ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK VERSUS SKIN INFILTRATION FOR POST OPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF IN SPINE SURGERIES

TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF INTRAOPERATIVE LANDMARK GUIDED ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK VERSUS SUBCUTANEOUS INFILTRATION TECHNIQUE FOR POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING THORACOLUMBAR SPINE SURGERIES- A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL - ESP BLOCK

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/10/016120
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-10-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R298- Other symptoms and signs involvingthe nervous and musculoskeletal systems

Interventions

Intervention1: ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK: Landmark technique erector spinae block given at the conclusion of the surgery using 40ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, 20ml on each side Control Intervention1: subcutaneo

Sponsors

Ganga Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Elective spine fusion surgery ASA I, II No neurological deficit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Fracture spine patient Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus Neurological deficit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VAS SCORE DURATION OF ANALGESIA Timepoint: VAS Score every 2 hour for 24 hours Duration Of Analgesia upto 24hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Consumption Of OpioidTimepoint: Consumption Of Opioid over 24hours

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR VIPIN KUMAR GOEL

GANGA HOSPITAL

drvipingoel@gmail.com9443369715

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026