FindTrial
Sign In

A comparison of five different instruments to put a tube into trachea under anesthesia.

Assessment of ease of intubation and incidence of orofacial injury at direct laryngoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing five different makes of laryngoscope blades (Miller, Reduced Flange, Macintosh, Flangeless and Blechmann blades).

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/10/016033
Enrollment
158
Registered
2018-10-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: V00-Y99- External causes of morbidity Health Condition 2: Y654- Failure to introduce or to removeother tube or instrument

Interventions

Intervention1: Macintosh Laryngoscope blade: Convenentional laryngoscopy technique involved Maacintosh laryngoscope blade. Control Intervention1: Miller Laryngoscope blade: Laryngoscopy and endotrache

Sponsors

Dr Chitta Ranjan Mohanty
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American society of anaesthesiologists I & II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Risk of aspiration( Pregnancy,Diabetes,Gastrointestinal obstruction) 2. Anticipated difficult intubation. 3. Upper respiratory tract infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of ease of Intubation.Timepoint: Fifteen minutes to One hour.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of degree of Orofacial injury.Timepoint: one to six hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Chitta Ranjan Mohanty

All India Institute of Medical Science Bhubaneswar

tem_chitta@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in9438884046

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026