Evaluation of two different cleaning techniques of root canals in grossly decayed teeth.

Evaluation of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for bio-mechanical preparation in permanent teeth - A randomised controlled trial.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/10/015932

Enrollment

Registered

2018-10-08

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K045- Chronic apical periodontitis Health Condition 2: K045- Chronic apical periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Hand instrumentation: The root canals will be instrumented using manual instrumentation method (Protaper Universal files, Dentsply) Control Intervention1: Rotary instrumentation: The ro

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria for recruiting in the study are: 1. Age group of 10-35 years of age. 2.Patients with the history of irreversible pulpitis. 3.Pain will be, sharp, piercing, continuous pain and spontaneous in nature 4.Pain will be exacerbated on bending down or lying down. 5.Patients with the decayed permanent molars with three canals (Maxillary and Mandibular)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria for exclusion of participants in the present trial are: 1.Patients with the clinical or radiographic evidence of peri apical abscess or cyst 2.Vital or non-vital mandibular permanent molars without sinus tract, 3.Teeth with internal or external pathologic root resorptions 4.Teeth showing the root canal curvatures more than 30 degrees. 5.Maxillary and Mandibular molars with more than three root canals 6.Patients with history of chronic systemic diseases. 7.Teeth with any morphological abnormalities. 8.Teeth with calcified canals and pulp stones.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Primary objective is to evaluate the instrumentation time between Protaper Universal as manual instrumentation and Protaper Next as rotary instrumentation method.Timepoint: 3 rd day (3 days after starting the intervention (Root canal treatment))	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1)To assess the quality of obturation between Protaper Universal as manual instrumentation and Protaper Next as rotary instrumentation method. 2)To evaluate the pain perception after instrumentations with Protaper Universal as manual instrumentation method and Protaper Next as rotary instrumentation method.Timepoint: 7 th day after starting the intervention (7 days after starting the intervention (Root canal treatment))	—

Measure

Time frame

1)To assess the quality of obturation between Protaper Universal as manual instrumentation and Protaper Next as rotary instrumentation method. 2)To evaluate the pain perception after instrumentations with Protaper Universal as manual instrumentation method and Protaper Next as rotary instrumentation method.Timepoint: 7 th day after starting the intervention (7 days after starting the intervention (Root canal treatment))

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vinay Chugh

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur

drvinaychd@yahoo.com8003996704

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026