FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison to check the long term use of three different filling material in cavities.

Comparative Evaluation Of Cention â??N, Equia Forte And Activa Bulk Fill Material In Class I Posterior Restortions- A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/10/015880
Enrollment
144
Registered
2018-10-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring Health Condition 2: null- suffering from dental caries and seaking treatment

Interventions

Intervention1: Cention-N GC Equia forte Activa bioactive restorative: Isolation will be done with help of rubber dam (HU- FRIEDY ) followed by Preparation of Class I cavities. The overall dimensions

Sponsors

Dr Riddhi Hirani
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 16-50. Class I Cavities. Willing to Participate in the Study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pathologic pulpal diagnosis with pain(non-vital). Defective restoration adjacent to or opposing the tooth. Rampant caries. Poor oral hygiene. Severe or chronic periodontitis. Heavy bruxism. Allergy to materials used in this trial With previous restorations, tooth surface loss (attrition, erosion, abrasion or abfraction).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
USPHS - United states public health servicesTimepoint: 1 month 3 month 6 month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
VAS -visual analogue ScaleTimepoint: 24 hrs,1 week ,1 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDRRIDDHI HIRANI

Manubhai Patel Dental College

renubatra@gmail.com9537528008

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026