Skip to content

Comparison of Intubation Conditions between three different types of laryngoscopes during rapid sequence induction intubation.

Comparision of Intubation Conditions between Airtraq, McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh under Conditions of Simulated Difficult Airway and Rapid Sequence Induction Intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/10/015874
Enrollment
300
Registered
2018-10-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: MCGRATH VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE GROUP GROUP M: THIS GROUP CONSISTS OF PATIENTS WHO ARE INTUBATED USING MCGRATH VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE AND IS TAKEN AS ONE OF THE INTERVENTIONAL GROUP AND STUDY WILL

Sponsors

NIMS HOSPITAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I or II, Age 18 - 60 years, both sex, patients with normal airway parameters, patients who are posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia requiring oral endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with anticipated difficult intubation or difficult mask ventilation, Patients with uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac disorders where hemodynamic responses to intubation may not be tolerated, Patients with poor pulmonary reserve where early desaturation is expected, patients with active secreting adrenal tumors. Patients with large thyroid mass or other neck masses precipitating difficult airway, Patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2, Pediatric age group, pregnant females, C-spine fracture or other cervical disorders with restricted neck movement or unstable cervical spine, faciomaxillary injury or anomalies, abnormalities of airway like burn contractures and cleft lip/palate, TMJ ankyloses, Unwillingness to give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We hypothesized that channeled video laryngoscope would provide better visualization in lesser time and safer for use in conditions of simulated difficult airway with rapid sequence induction intubation requiring cricoid pressure as compared to non-channeled video laryngoscope and conventional laryngoscope.Timepoint: preoperative period to oral endotracheal intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
this study can be useful for intubating patients with difficult airway parameters in the longrunTimepoint: preoperative period to oral endotracheal intubation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPadmaja Durga

NIZAMs INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

padmajanims@yahoo.com9440387299

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026