FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two different techniques of subretinal fluid drainage in vitrectomy for retinal detachment

Anatomical and functional outcomes in posterior retinotomy verses perfluorocarbon liquid assisted drainage in vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/09/015816
Enrollment
52
Registered
2018-09-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H330- Retinal detachment with retinal break Health Condition 2: null- Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Interventions

Intervention1: Perfluoro-n-octane liquid(Auro octane): Perfluorocarbon liquid(PFCL) 2-4ml will be injected through pars plana ports until subretinal fluid is drained out through original break in reti

Sponsors

Prof Rajpal Vohra
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients giving voluntary informed consent for enrolling into the study 2. Patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment undergoing vitreoretinal surgery 3. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy less than grade C1 4. Above 18yrs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Macular pathology other than retinal detachment affecting visual outcome 2. Glaucoma 3. Any optic nerve pathology 4. Previously failed retinal surgery/buckling

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
anatomical and functional outcomesTimepoint: 1 week 1 month 3 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Intraoperative and postoperative complicationsTimepoint: 1 week 1 month 3 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Neha Kumari

Dr. R.P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS Delhi

vohrarajpal@gmail.com9818598899

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026