Skip to content

A single blind, randomized controlled study to compare Desarda technique with Lichtenstein technique by evaluating short and long term outcomes after three years of follow up in primary inguinal hernias.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF USE OF EXTERNAL OBLIQUE APONEUROSIS FOR STRENGTHENING OF POSTERIOR WALL OF INGUINAL CANAL(NO MESH DESARDAS TECHNIQUE) VS CONVENTIONAL HERNIA REPAIR WITH MESH (LICHENSTEINS REPAIR)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/09/015783
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-09-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K402- Bilateral inguinal hernia, withoutobstruction or gangrene Health Condition 2: K409- Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene

Interventions

Intervention1: Desarda Repair of Inguinal Hernia: Use of patients own external oblique aponeurosis to strenthen the posterior wall of inguinal canal as a part of hernia repair Intervention2: Lichenste

Sponsors

KIMS Hospital and Research CEntre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All cases of inguinal hernia admitted for surgery Above 18 years of age. 2. With a primary, reducible inguinal or inguino-scrotal hernia; unilateral or bilateral

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with: 1. Obstructive uropathy or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- because they are contraindications to elective hernia surgery. They are associated with definite poor outcomes such as high recurrence rates. 2. Old and debilitated patients of poor general condition as they will be unable to give an accurate assessment of the key outcomes of the operation. 3. Patients with strangulated hernia. 4. Recurrent Hernias. 5. Per operative finding of seperated,thin and/or weak external oblique aponeurosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the short term outcomes and recurrence rate for one year between Lichensteins and Desardas technique. Timepoint: To compare the short term outcomes and recurrence rate for one year between Lichensteins and Desardas technique.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To study the short term outcome in the following ways: Operating time Post operative pain Ambulation time Induration/redness  of the operated site Post op wound infection rate Discharge time Cost of procedure in total Timepoint: 1 month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHemanth Vupputuri

Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences

satikramaiah62@gmail.com919739966876

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026