Skip to content

Clinical and radiographic evaluation and comparision of the effects of definitive abutment versus conventional repeated abutment disconnection and reconnection on peri-implant tissues.

Comparative evaluation of definitive abutment versus conventional repeated abutment disconnection and reconnection on peri-implant tissues: A prospective clinical and radiographic trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/09/015726
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-09-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: treatment of missing tooth/teeth using implants with definitive versus provisional abutments.: effect of definitive abutment versus conventional repeated abutment disconnection and reco

Sponsors

None
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Systemically healthy patient of at least 21 years of age. 2. Partially edentulous maxilla or mandible requiring dental implant/s. 3. Adequate volume of native or grafted bone to accommodate dental implants. 4. Sites at which minimum torque of 35 Nm is obtained at the time of implant insertion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. General contraindications to implant surgery. 2. Individuals subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area, within the last 6 months. 3. Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. 4. Smokers or patients with poor oral hygiene. 5. Patients with para-functional habits. 6. Pregnant or lactating females. 7. An acute or chronic infection at the site intended for implant placement.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome will be peri-implant marginal bone level measured from the implant shoulder to the crest of the bone at baseline and 6 months after loading, using RVG and CBCT.Timepoint: baseline and 6 months after loading

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcome will be Plaque index, Bleeding on probing and Probing depth, measured at 3 and 6 months after implant insertion, by using UNC 15 probe. Patient satisfaction will be assessed by a questionnaire at baseline and 6 months.Timepoint: baseline, 3 months and 6 months.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abhay Kolte

VSPM Dental College and Research Centre

drrajashrikolte@gmail.com09011071468

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026