FindTrial
Sign In

To compare the difference in port site wound infection using endo bag and without using it in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy surgery.

Comparative study of port site infection after gall bladder retrieval using indigenously designed endo bag and without using endo bag during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/09/015634
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-09-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- All patients of symptomatic cholelithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

ANKITA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: inclusion: all patients of symptomatic cholelithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: exclusion: gall bladder gangrene,pyocoele,perforation,immunocompromised patients like Aids,steroid,and any co morbid condition like diabetic uraemia and carcinoma gall bladder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the difference between port site infection in both the techniques using end bag and without using end bag for gall bladder retrieval during Laparoscopic CholecystectomyTimepoint: 30 April 2019—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
port site infection in both the techniques one using endo bag and other without using endo bag while retrieving the gall bladder specimen during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Timepoint: port site infection on third post operative day and then 4 weeks.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactANKITA

peoples College of Medical Science and Research Center Bhopal

dateyashirvad@gmail.com7566944068

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026