FindTrial
Sign In

To determine the efficacy of two commerically available herbal products during root canal treatment

Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Two Commercially Available Herbal products as Root Canal Irrigants and Intracanal Medicaments in Primary Endodontic Infection

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/09/015627
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-09-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: intracanal irrigants and medicaments: to disinfect the canal during and between appointment Control Intervention1: chlorhexidine gluconate: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate Irrigation will be

Sponsors

Sudha Rustagi Dental College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with non-contributory medical history, intact permanent teeth without any previous restoration, teeth with necrotic or infected pulp as diagnosed clinically and radiographically, teeth with adequate coronal structure for proper isolation, temporization, and restoration were included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with systemic conditions, acute periapical abscess, retreatment cases, patients on antibiotic therapy within three months, teeth with calcified canals, sinus opening, immature apex, internal or external resorption, teeth with periodontal pockets >5 mm were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction in bacterial countTimepoint: 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Colony counts in different groups at stages S1, S2 and S3.Timepoint: 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGoldy Rathee

Sudha Rustagi Dental College

rathee.goldy1990@gmail.com88261817086

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026