Skip to content

Non-Complex Biliary Stones Randomized Controlled Trial

Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Endoscopic Clearance of Non-Complex Biliary Stones Using Fluoroscopy/Radiation-Free Direct Solitary Cholangioscopy (DSC) to Standard of Care Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (ERC)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/09/015588
Enrollment
250
Registered
2018-09-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patients with confirmed non-complex bile duct stones.

Interventions

Intervention1: SpyGlassâ?¢ Direct Visualization System (DS): -SpyGlassâ?¢ DS Digital Controller is intended to provide illumination and receive, process, and output images from the SpyScopeâ?¢ DS Acce

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. 18 years or older 2. Abdominal pain consistent with choledocholithiasis (procedure possible within 72 hours of onset of symptoms and imaging suggesting choledocholithiasis, contingent on persistent abdominal pain) 3. Abnormal LFTs 4. Non-complex biliary stone disease, defined as 5 or fewer stones in the common bile or common hepatic duct with largest stone no larger than 10 mm in size. If stones not seen on imaging (US, CT) the bile duct diameter should be less than or equal to 12 mm - Given the poor sensitivity (approximately 20%) for biliary stones of CT and US, the diameter of the dilated CBD is used as a surrogate for largest stone diameter 5. Availability of non-invasive imaging to determine the diameter of the bile duct and number and size of bile duct stones if visible on imaging a. If probability of stones is high per investigator assessment based on ASGE criteria, any standard of practice imaging modality (eg. abdominal US) is acceptable. b. If the probability of stones is either intermediate or low per investigator assessment based on ASGE criteria, MRCP or EUS imaging is required to confirm presence of stones. 6. Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Potentially vulnerable subjects, including but not limited to pregnant women and subjects in whom an endoscopic procedure is contraindicated 2. Location of the stones in intrahepatic ducts, cystic duct or proximal to strictures 3. Bile duct stricture noted distal to stone on MRCP, which would make extraction without lithotripsy impossible 4. Ongoing cholangitis at time of randomization, manifested by fever with tachycardia and hypotension or evidence of pus at the ampulla 5. Patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy 6. Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) 7. Acute pancreatitis, defined as abdominal pain and serum concentration of pancreatic enzymes [lipase (required), amylase (optional)] three or more times the upper limit of normal 8. Surgically altered gastro-duodenal luminal anatomy other than prior Billroth I reconstruction, as these would be anticipated to lead to more complicated procedures 9. Coagulopathy or ongoing need for anti-coagulation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is complete stone clearance by extraction of bile duct stones from the common bile duct (CBD) into duodenum as determined by fluoroscopy free cholangioscopy in the DSC arm and by cholangiography in the ERC arm.Timepoint: Primary objectives and secondary objectives are assessed post procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of procedure defined as time from duodenoscope in to completion of stone clearance, not including the validation DSC procedure in ERC arm and ERC procedure in DSC arm.Timepoint: Primary objectives and secondary objectives are assessed post procedure.;Evaluation of all serious adverse events (SAEs) including all deaths (related and unrelated), severity, onset, time to resolution related to the DSC devices and/or procedure and/or the ERC procedure through 30 days post procedure. Timepoint: Primary objectives and secondary objectives are assessed post procedure.;Radiation exposure to the patient (total fluoroscopy time, total radiation dose, Dose Area Product (DAP), effective dose), from duodenoscope in to completion of stone clearance, not including the validation DSC procedure in ERC arm and ERC procedure in DSC arm.Timepoint: Primary objectives and secondary objectives are assessed post procedure.

Countries

India, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Thailand, United States of America

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mohan Ramchandani

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

ramchandanimohan@gmail.com91-40-23378888

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026