Skip to content

A clinical study to compare the immunological response and safety of two Hepatitis B vaccines in healthy adult subjects

A prospective, randomized, two-arm, parallel, single-blind, active-controlled, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of Hepatitis B Vaccine (rDNA) of M/s Cadila Healthcare Limited compared to Engerix-B of M/s GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals in healthy adult subjects

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/08/015476
Enrollment
238
Registered
2018-08-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z23- Encounter for immunization

Interventions

Intervention1: Hepatitis B vaccine (rDNA) I.P. of M/s Cadila Healthcare Ltd.: Subjects will receive three doses (1 ml each) of the vaccine on day 0, day 30 and day 60 respectively. The vaccine will be

Sponsors

Cadila Healthcare Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Healthy adult subjects of either gender between 20-50 years 2.Subjects willing to give written informed consent 3.Subjects literate enough to fill the diary card 4.Subjects negative for serological markers for Hepatitis B (HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HBc)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.History of known or suspected allergy to any of the vaccine components 2.History of Hepatitis B vaccination 3.History of Hepatitis B infection or carrier state 4.Known history of thrombocytopenia or any coagulation disorder, or subjects on anticoagulation therapy 5.Subjects with confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficiency disorder; or subjects on any immunosuppressive or immunostimulant therapy 6.Clinically significant systemic disorder such as hepatic, cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, gastrointestinal, renal, endocrine, hematological or immunological disorder 7.History of any acute illness within the last 1 week 8.Subjects with febrile illness (temperature >=38 oC) at the time of presentation 9.Subjects administered blood, blood containing products or immunoglobulins within the last 3 months or planned administration during the study 10.Any vaccine administration within the last 30 days 11.Pregnant and lactating women & female subjects not using acceptable contraceptive measures (double barrier methods, oral or injectable hormonal contraceptives or surgical sterilization) 12.Subjects with history of alcohol or drug abuse in the past one year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of subjects with sero-protective levels of anti-HBs antibodies at the end of studyTimepoint: Day 90 (30 days after third dose of vaccine)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Geometric mean titre of anti-HBs antibodies at baseline and at the end of studyTimepoint: Day 0 and Day 90 (30 days after third dose of vaccine);Proportion of subjects with anti-HBs antibody titre â?¥100 mIU/ml (high-responders) at the end of studyTimepoint: Day 90 (30 days after third dose of vaccine)

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pavankumar Daultani

Cadila Healthcare Ltd

r.mittal@zyduscadila.com079-26868926

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026