Skip to content

Telerehabilitation versus conventional Physical therapy rehabilitation in Hip pathology

Telerehabilitation versus conventional Physical therapy rehabilitation in people with Hip pathologyâ?? A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/08/015473
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-08-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M849- Disorder of continuity of bone, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Telerehabilitation: The experimental group will be given a training session with the use of the application to make them acquainted to the technology. A written flowchart as a guide wil

Sponsors

Manipal Academy of Higher Education KMC Mangalore
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria Patients with the following conditions will be included for the study. 1 Fracture around the hip referred for Physical Therapy (Head of femur, intertrochanteric, neck of femur, actetabular, shaft of femur, Pelvic girdle) 2 Fracture around the hip surgically managed 3Patients with the ability to comprehend English language (read and understand)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion Criteria Patients with the following conditions will not be included in the study. 1 Poly trauma cases with the involvement of multiple joints and bones 2 Inability to comprehend command 3 Does not have internet connection either in phone or computer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
NPRS Assessment of ROM and strength of the region HOOS SF36 Self-made satisfaction questionnaire for treatment and application useTimepoint: NPRS at every visit Assessment of ROM and strength of the region, begining and end of 6 weeks intervention HOOS at the end of 6 weeks intervention SF36 4 weeks after the 6 weeks intervention Self-made satisfaction questionnaire for treatment and application use 6 weeks after intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
cost of treatment cost of travel cost of internet useTimepoint: end of study which is 6 weeks from the start

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactManisha P Shenoy

KMC Manipal University, Mangalore

paraimanisha@gmail.com08792480796

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026