Comparison of mechanical dilatation versus medical method for induction of labour

Comparison of extra amniotic saline infusion plus misoprostol versus misoprostol for labour induction

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/08/015441

Enrollment

100

Registered

2018-08-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- PREGNANT WOMEN FOR INDUCTION OF LABOUR

Interventions

Intervention1: INTRACERVICAL FOLEYS BULB INFLATION WITH EXTRA AMNIOTIC SALINE INFUSION WITH MISOPROSTOL: INTRACERVICAL FOLEYS BULB INFLATION WITH EXTRA AMNIOTIC SALINE INFUSION WITH MISOPROSTOL Contro

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: PREGNANT WOMEN SINGLETON PREGNANCY PREGNANCY BEYOND 28WEEKS CEPHALIC PRESENTATION POOR BISHOPS SCORE

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Evidence of spontaneous labour Known contraindications for induction of labour Known contraindications for misoprostol Significant vaginal bleeding Previous scar on uterus

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Induction of labour to delivery intervalTimepoint: Time of induction of labour to delivery interval	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Maternal and fetal outcomeTimepoint: Time of induction of labour to active phase of labour	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sahana Naik

SDM Medical college and hospital,Sattur,Dharwar

sahanasurpur@gmail.com9886915751

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026