To compare two teeth filling materials to prevent early decay in children

Comparative evaluation of retention, marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration of two different pit and fissure sealants:an in vivo study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/08/015206

Enrollment

120

Registered

2018-08-06

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Deep retentive pits and Fissures in teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultraseal XT Hydro sealant: Hydrophilic pit and fissure sealant Control Intervention1: Conseal F sealant: Hydrophobic pit and fissure sealant

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)6-9 year old healthy children 2)Fully erupted first permanent molars 3)Deep retentive pits and fissures 4)Caries free first permanent molars 5)Unstained fissures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Incipient caries 2)Deep cavitated carious lesions 3)Teeth with proximal caries 4)Restoration or sealant on occlusal surface of any first permanent molar 5)Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation 6)Teeth with developmental disturbances 7)Use of removable or fixed orthodontic appliance 8)Patient with systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1)Retention 2)Marginal adaptation 3)Marginal discolorationTimepoint: 1 year	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1)Retention 2)Marginal adaptation 3)Marginal discolorationTimepoint: Immediate 1 month 3 month 6 month	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSanjana Sanjay Ghadge

Terna Dental College

childentist@yahoo.com9867203146

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026