EFFECT OF TWO DIFFERENT STRETCHING TECHNIQUES ON LUMBAR MOBILITY IN INDIVIDUALS WITH LOW BACK PAIN

EFFECT OF MULLIGANS STRETCHING AND CONVENTIONAL STRETCHING OM LUMBO-PELVIC MOBILITY IN SUBJECTS WITH NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN- A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/07/015105

Enrollment

Registered

2018-07-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- non-specific low back pain

Interventions

Intervention1: hot moist pack, mulligans stretching, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation(TENS): hot moist pack will be given for the low back region for 15 minutes, 3 sets of mulligans stretch

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: subjects with non-specific low back pain and recurrent low back pain within a duration of more than 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: any neuroligical symptoms involving prolapsed intervertebral disc, radiating pain,history of any back abdominal or lower-limb surgery, pregnancy, any systemic illness, malignancy, psychological risk factor.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
numeric pain rating scale, degree of lumbar lordosis, modified schobers testTimepoint: on the 1st day pre-intervention, on 7th day post-intervention and 14th day post-intervention	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
modified oswestry disability questionnaireTimepoint: on the 1st day pre-intervention, on the 7th day post-intervention and 14th day post-intervention	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAmogh Kulkarni

KLE Institute of Physiotherapy

metgud_santosh@yahoo.co.in9880088400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026