FindTrial
Sign In

A COMPARATIVE STUDY USING 2 TYPES OF LARYNGOSCOPIC BLADES TO VIEW VOCAL CORDS AND EASE TO PUT TRACHEAL TUBE THROUGH PATIENTS MOUTH IN ADULTS for BREATHING UNDER ANAESTHESIA.

A COMPARATIVE CROSSOVER RANDOMIZED STUDY OF MILLERS AND MACINTOSH BLADE FOR LARYNGOSCOPIC VIEW AND EASE OF INTUBATING CONDITIONS IN ADULTS.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/07/015064
Enrollment
172
Registered
2018-07-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Stable patients with no medical illness.

Interventions

Intervention1: MAC INTOSH AND MILLER BLADE.: LARYNGOSCOPIC VIEW IS COMPARED USING MAC INTOSH AND MILLER BLADE. Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Dr NALINI KB
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.American Society of Anaesthesiologist grades I and II for elective surgeries under General anaesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients who refuse to give consent, 2.Pregnant patients, 3.Patients who are considered full stomach, 4.Patients with anticipated difficult intubation, 5.Previous oral surgeries /oral thrush, pathology in neck, -Ischemic heart disease patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
LARYNGOSCOPIC VIEW IS BETTER USING MILLER BLADE THEN WITH MACINTOSH BLADE.Timepoint: At the end of 2years from start of study.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
EASE OF INTUBATION IS BETTER WITH MAC INTOSH BLADE THEN WIYH MILLER BLADE.Timepoint: 6 MONTHS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nalini K B

RGUHS Bangalore

dr_kbnalini@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026