Skip to content

a study comparison of time taken for extraction space closure after tooth removal in cases with regular method and following surgical bone reduction.

Comparison of Rate of Canine Retraction following Interseptal Bone Reduction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/07/015041
Enrollment
16
Registered
2018-07-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M263- Anomalies of tooth position of fully erupted tooth or teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Individual Canine Retraction using Implants with Interseptal Bone Reduction: Closing of the Extraction site distal to Canine after reduction of the Interseptal bone between Canine and P

Sponsors

Rashmika Raghavan
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Angles Class 1 and Class 2 division 1 malocclusion. 2. Maximum Anchorage cases. 3. Maxillary Canine being in the line of arch.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous history of Orthodontic treatment. 2. Long term use of medications. 3. Any Systemic and Periodontal Pathology. 4. Any Dental Pathology.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Closure of the extraction site distal to the Canine.Timepoint: First, Second, Third months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Bodily movement of the Canine without Tipping and Rotations.Timepoint: First, Second, Third months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGoutham Chakravarthy V

Vishnu Dental College

gouthamortho@gmail.com9948922209

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026