FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative study of fluoroscopy vs ultrasound guided stellate ganglion block

Comparative study of fluoroscopy vs ultrasound guided stellate ganglion block

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/07/015040
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-07-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: NONE: NONE Control Intervention1: NONE: NA

Sponsors

department of anaesthesiology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Sympathetically mediated pain involving of upper extremities, and head and neck region. B) Patients aged 18-60 years C) Patients of either sex.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients refusal 2. Patients associated with any comorbidity. 3. History of allergy to local anaesthetic. 4. Skin lesion at the site of blockade. 5. Central or peripheral neuropathies or coagulopathy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
USG and fluoroscopy are both good techniques for SGB, but due to less complication, early blocking effect time,more precise placement of medication USG Guided block is preferred over fluoroscopy methodTimepoint: ONE YEAR—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NONETimepoint: NA—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSARITA SINGH

KING GEORGES MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LUCKNOW

leositu31@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026