Health Condition 1: null- ASA Grade I and II
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: USB Video Laryngoscope: To Compare the laryngoscopy and intubation time
Control Intervention1: Macintosh laryngoscope: To compare laryngoscopy and intubation time
Sponsors
Department Of Anaesthesiology
Syed Hussain Amir
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade I & II patients. Age between 25-60 years Weight between 45-70 kg Patients of either sex(male/female) Patients planned for elective surgery
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Previous history of multiple/ failed intubation. Predicted difficult laryngoscopy except for all class of MP Grades Any pathology of the oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device Mouth opening less than 2.5cm. Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the laryngoscopy & intubation time using the two intubating devices. To compare the number of attempts required for successful intubation To grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices Timepoint: two years | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the glottic view using Cormack and Lehane Grading. To compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation. To compare changes in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure during laryngoscopy and intubation using the two devices. To look for any trauma during laryngoscopy and intubation. To record the incidence of postoperative sore throat within 24 hrs. Timepoint: two years | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactQazi Ehsan Ali
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College
Outcome results
None listed