FindTrial
Sign In

EFFECT OF TWO TYPES OF MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES ON HEADACHE

EFFECT OF SUSTAINED NATURAL APOPHYSEAL GLIDES (SNAGs) VERSUS UPPER CERVICAL TRANSLATORIC MOBILIZATION (UC-TSM)ON SUBJECTS WITH CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL - RCT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/07/014960
Enrollment
54
Registered
2018-07-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Cervicogenic headache

Interventions

Intervention1: Group B-SNAGs: Patient position : Sitting upright on the edge of a chair. Therapist position: Standing behind the patient. Hand placement: Therapist places pulp of the thumb over the af

Sponsors

KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects willing to participate in the study. All gender subjects aged between 18 to 40 years. Subjects who fulfil the diagnostic criteria of CGH. given by Sjaastad and Fredriksen. Positive Flexion Rotation Test.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Headache due to non cervical origin. Headache with autonomic involvement, dizziness, or visual disturbance. Congenital conditions of the cervical spine. Red flags to mobilizations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cervical Range of Motion Flexion Rotation TestTimepoint: On the 1st day before intervention and on 6th day after intervention.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
headache Disability IndexTimepoint: On the 1st day before intervention and on 6th day after intervention.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactJosephine Junia Gonsalves

KLEs Institute of Physiotherapy Belagavi

anandhegs@gmail.com9945282896

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026