COMPARISION BETWEEN TWO TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE MUSCLES ON THE BACK OF THE THIGH

STUDY TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULLIGANâ??S BENT LEG RAISE TECHNIQUE WITH FOAM ROLLING TECHNIQUE ON HAMSTRING FLEXIBILITY IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS â?? A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/07/014820

Enrollment

120

Registered

2018-07-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: GROUP A: WILL RECEIVE MULLIGAN BENT LEG RAISE TECHNIQUE Control Intervention1: GROUP B: WILL RECEIVE FOAM ROLLING TECHNIQUE

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Normal, healthy students with decreased straight leg raise (less than 70 degrees) of either gender. 2)Subjects who are willing to participate. 3)Subjects within the age group of 18-25 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Any neurological disorders. 2)History of any lower extremity injury / disease in past 6 months. 3)History of lower limb or spinal surgeries. 4)Subjects having acute or chronic low back pain. 5)Any other muscular condition which might impair the outcome of sit and reach test.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
SIT AND REACH FLEXIBILITY TESTTimepoint: PRE INTERVENTION, POST INTERVENTION AND 48 HOURS AFTER INTERVENTION THE OUTCOME MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR RAJEEV K LAL

SDM COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HOSPITAL

lalrk@yahoo.com9986202056

Outcome results