FindTrial
Sign In

comparing Airtraq video laryngoscope with Mac Intosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation

COMPARISON OF AIRTRAQ LARYNGOSCOPE WITH MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE IN AIRWAY MANAGEMENT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/06/014510
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-06-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA grade I & II patients posted for various surgeries under general anaesthesia

Interventions

Intervention1: Airtraq video laryngoscope: Intubation performed with airtraq video laryngoscope Control Intervention1: Mac intosh laryngoscope: Intubation performed with Mac intosh laryngoscope,compar

Sponsors

katuri medical college Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I & II Mallampati grades I&II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Inter-incisor distance 2) Body mass index(BMI) >30kg/m2 3) pregnant women. 4) Uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac disease, hepatic or renal impairment. 5) Patients recognised as difficult laryngoscopy and intubation during pre-anaesthetic evaluation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of intubation,Timepoint: 1 year 5 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hemodynamic changes with Laryngoscopy and intubationTimepoint: 1 year 5 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bharath Kumar Pamulapati

Katuri Medical College & Hospital

vrkc1983@yahoo.com924683405

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026