Health Condition 1: null- ASA I and ASA II Age between 18-65 years Mallampati Class I, II and III
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Comparison between Kingvision videolaryngoscope and Truview laryngoscope: Comparison of two video laryngoscope: guide channel and optical laryngoscope in patients undergoing tracheal in
Sponsors
Artemis Health Institute
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA I and ASA II Mallampati class I, II and III
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati class IV, thyromental distance interincisor gap Presence of risk factor for gastric aspiration e.g. pregnancy. Uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, hepatic and renal impairment. Loose teeth and artificial dentures. BMI > 35. Oral pathology. CNS disorder.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| IDS score was less in King Vision ® (1.63±1.25) as compared to Truview ® EVO2 (2.03±1.38). But the difference between King Vision and Truview ® EVO2 groups were not statistically significant.Timepoint: During laryngoscopy and intubation | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Mean duration of intubation was significantly longer in Truview® EVO2 group as compared to King Vision®. Haemodynamic parameters (HR, MAP, Spo2) were comparable in both groups with no statistical significant difference. No major complication in any of the groups.Timepoint: During laryngoscopy and intubation and 5 minutes post intubation. | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Rajesh Misra
Artemis Hospitals
Outcome results
None listed