A comparative study for giving breaths to patients during anaesthesia using three different kind of devices

I-Gel As An Intubation Conduit: Comparison Of Three Different Types Of Endotracheal Tube

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/05/014032

Enrollment

Registered

2018-05-22

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA Performace status 1 and 2

Interventions

Intervention1: Intubation with PVC Endotracheal tube through i-Gel: During general anaesthesia i-gel was put for ventilation and through that intubation was done using a PVC endotracheal tube Interven

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of ASA performance status 1 and 2 undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with Modified Mallampati class of 1 and 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with anticipated difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Successful Endotracheal intubation timeTimepoint: Time taken from holding the endotracheal tube in hand for insertion through i-Gel till successful intubation noted by appearance of first square shaped capnogram	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Number of attempts required for successful insertion of endotracheal tube throgh i-GelTimepoint: Proper placement confirmed with chest rise, Capnography, Fibreoptic bronchoscopy and Brimacombe scoring. Total of three attempts of i-gel insertion will be considered till Brimacomb score of 3 or 4 achieved.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAbhijit Kumar

Maulana Azad Medical College

dramitkohli@yahoo.com9818073402

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026