FindTrial
Sign In

A study comparing nasogastric tube guided nasal intubation vs conventional nasal intubation

To evaluate the role of nasogastric tube as a guide to facilitate nasotracheal intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/05/013906
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-05-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patients posted for Surgery under General Anaesthesia

Interventions

Intervention1: Nasogastric Tube guided nasotracheal intubation: A lubricated nasogastric tube (16Fr) was inserted into the tracheal tube (7.5 mm and 7.0 mm for male and female respectively) and positi

Sponsors

Department of anaesthesiology and critical care Pt BDSharma PGIMS UHS Rohtak
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade 1 and 2 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with history of hypertension, recurrent epistaxis, abnormal coagulation status, basilar skull fracture, predicted difficult airway, severe midfacial trauma and oropharyngeal or nasal growth were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To Compare incidence of Nasal Trauma, Time taken for Nasotracheal Intubation, PostOperative Pain and complications in both the groups.Timepoint: Preoperatively for nasotracheal intubation—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To Compare Ease of Insertion and Number of Attempts for Nasotracheal Intubation in both the groups.Timepoint: Preoperatively for nasotracheal intubation.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nidhi

Pt. B.D. Sharma, PGIMS, UHS Rohtak

drnidhi603@gmail.com8607166690

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026