Application of two tooth decay preventive agents and its comparison among 7-10 Year Old School Children

Clinical Evaluation Of Hydrophobic And Hydrophilic Pit And Fissure Sealants Among 7-10 Year Old School Children â?? An Interventional Study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/05/013871

Enrollment

Registered

2018-05-14

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Hydrophilic pit and fissure sealants: It is the Moisture-Tolerant, resin-based Pit and Fissure Sealant (Embrace Wet Bond) that could effectively tolerate some degree of moisture when a

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children aged 7-10 years with fully erupted mandibular permanent first molars bilaterally. 2. Children scoring 0 or 1 according to ICDAS II criteria for detecting caries in their mandibular permanent first molars. 3. Children who have low risk of caries based on caries risk assessment tool. 4. Children who have caries free teeth presenting with deep pit and fissures. 5. Children whose parents do wish to give consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Children presenting with caries,pulpal involvement and restorations. 2.Children with any preventive measures carried out priorly. 3.Children who have enamel defects like amelogenesis imperfecta, enamel hypoplasia and dental fluorosis. 4. Children who have space infections as a complication of the dentition. 5. Children undergoing orthodontic treatment. 6. Children who are under medications for any systemic illness altering the salivary composition and flow. 7. Children who are differentially abled.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The effect of sealant retention Will be assessed using modified simonsonâ??s criteriaTimepoint: at baseline,3 months,6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
3. To evaluate and compare additional factors such as colour match, marginal discolouration, secondary caries, anatomic form, marginal adaptation and surface texture of proximal sealants and adhesive systems months using United States Public Health Service - Modified Ryge Criteria for Direct Clinical Evaluation of Restorations proposed by Cvar and Ryge, 1980Timepoint: at baseline,3 months,6 months	—

Measure

Time frame

3. To evaluate and compare additional factors such as colour match, marginal discolouration, secondary caries, anatomic form, marginal adaptation and surface texture of proximal sealants and adhesive systems months using United States Public Health Service - Modified Ryge Criteria for Direct Clinical Evaluation of Restorations proposed by Cvar and Ryge, 1980Timepoint: at baseline,3 months,6 months

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr P D Madan Kumar

Ragas Dental College and Hospital affiliated to The Tamilnadu Dr M G R Medical University

phdragas@gmail.com9841760306

Outcome results