FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two different types of supraglottic devices used while intubation .

Comparison of effectiveness of Ambu Auragain LMA and Proseal LMA in elective surgery.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/05/013738
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-05-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA 1 and 2 undergoing elective surgeries.

Interventions

Intervention1: Supraglottic airway device: Comparison of two different supraglottic airway devices for intubation. Control Intervention1: Ambu Auragain LMA: It has preformed curve which replicates hum

Sponsors

DrHasmukh Patel
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Mallampati grading 1 and 2 2.ASA-1 and 2 3.Weight 30-70 kg of either sex

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Mallampati grading -3 and 4 2.ASA-3,4 and 5 3.Morbidly obese 4.Pregnant patient 5.Oesophageal pathology 6.URTI in past 10 days 7.K/C/O gastroesophageal reflux disease 8.Emergency surgeries 9.Patient not willing for participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Insertion time of both devices. 2.Number of attempts of insertion.Timepoint: 1.Appearence of first end tidal wave—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Oropharyngeal leak pressure 2.Ventilatory parametersTimepoint: 5 minutes after establishing airway.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrApeksha Patwa

Medical College Baroda

patwaapeksha@gmail.com9879540828

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026