Skip to content

Effectiveness of task oriented trunk training on trunk control and community reintegration in comparison with conventional therapy among acute stroke subjects: a randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of task oriented trunk training on trunk control and community reintegration in comparison with conventional therapy among acute stroke subjects: a randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/05/013725
Enrollment
114
Registered
2018-05-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Medically Stable Acute Stroke Subjects Health Condition 2: I693- Sequelae of cerebral infarction Health Condition 3: I69- Sequelae of cerebrovascular disease Health Condition 4: I691- Sequelae of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage Health Condition 5: I690- Sequelae of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage

Interventions

Intervention1: Task Oriented Trunk Training: task oriented trunk training in addition to conventional physiotherapy (impairment based) to affected side upper and lower limbs Control Intervention1: C

Sponsors

Kasturba Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Clinically stable subjects with first episode of supra-tentorial stroke in the acute stage. 2)20 years to 80 years of age. 3)Mini-Mental Scale Examination score of >=23. 4)Ability to sit for 30 seconds. 5)Trunk impairment Scale score less than 23.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Multiple episode of stroke. 2)Neurological disorders other than stroke that could influence balance and ambulation. 3)Subjects with a history of diagnosed musculoskeletal or cardiovascular disorders of the trunk and/or lower extremities who canâ??t tolerate treatment positions and intensity. 4)Subject having perceptual issues like hemi-neglect, pusherâ??s syndrome, severe visual field defects and somato-sensory deficit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1)Trunk Impairment Scale 2)Trunk muscle strength using hand Held Dynamometer 3) RNLI for Community Re-integrationTimepoint: pre intervention, 2 weeks post inpatient rehabilitation, 4 weeks post home rehabilitation and 6 moths follow up assessment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
BESTest for balance, ABC for Balance self Efficacy, PALM for pelvic alignmentTimepoint: pre intervention, 2 weeks post inpatient rehabilitation, 4 weeks post home rehabilitation and 6 moths follow up assessment

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAkshatha Nayak

Kasturba Medical College

akshatha.nd@manipal.edu9986054034

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026