Comparative evaluation of two techniques for the restoration of fractured teeth

Comparative Evaluation of Putty Index and Custom Template for Direct Composite Restoration of Uncomplicated Crown Fractures in Permanent Anterior Teeth

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/05/013724

Enrollment

100

Registered

2018-05-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Uncomplicated crown fracture of permanent anterior teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Restoration of fractured crown of permanent anterior teeth: Direct Composite Restoration Control Intervention1: Putty Index technique and Custom Template technique: Direct Composite Res

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Crown fracture in any of the teeth 11,12,21,22 2.Centric contact in middle third or cervical third. 3.1/3 to 1/2 of crown structure fracture. 4.overjet( >2mm) 5.Positive patient assent and informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Pulpal Exposure 2.Luxation injury or root fracture. 3.Edge to edge bites relation 4.Patient with any systemic diseases/ syndrome/habits(thumb sucking,mouth breathing,nail biting)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Primary Outcome-1.Clinical evaluation by two individual blinded evaluators using modified USPHS criteria 2. Objective evaluation-using spectrophotometer Secondary Objective-Chairside timeTimepoint: 6months,12 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
chair side time recordedTimepoint: 1st appiontment and 2nd appointment	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactIshrat Siddiqui

Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

VIJAYMATHUR7@YAHOO.COM9811955553

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026