Comparing root coverage procedures

Comparison of Tarnow Technique With PRF To Tarnow Technique With CTG for Root Coverage : A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/05/013576

Enrollment

Registered

2018-05-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- gingival recession

Interventions

Intervention1: Tarnow technique with Connective Tissue Graft: Tarnow technique with Connective Tissue Graft will be used to treat gingival recession site Control Intervention1: tarnow technique with P

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The existence of single unilateral or bilateral gingival recession defects with a recession depth of greater than or equal to 2 mm Teeth with adequate attached gingiva greater than or equal to 3mm All recessions must be in Miller classes one subgroup Ability to maintain good oral hygiene and Sufficient vestibular depth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Smoking Pregnancy Root surface restorations Endodontic treatment and Presence of bleeding on probing Systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
root coverage width and heightTimepoint: baseline 1st month 3rd month 6th month	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Probing pocket depth Clinical attachment level Plaque Index Bleeding Index Keratinized tissue width Healing index Visual analog scaleTimepoint: baseline 1st month 3rd month 6th month	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSheetal S

Sri Rajiv Gandhi college of Dental sciences and Hospital

apoorva.maringanti@gmail.com7411047713

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026