Health Condition 1: null- ASA Physical Status I and II
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: King Vision Video laryngoscope and Airtraq Video laryngoscope: Intubation Time comparison and Hemodynamics
Control Intervention1: Airtraq optical video laryngoscope: Intubation time com
Sponsors
Department of Anaesthesiology
Qazi Ehsan Ali
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade I and II Weight between 45-70 Kg Patients planned for Elective Surgery
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Previous history of multiple/ failed intubation. Head and neck surgery. Valvular heart disease. CAD / Uncontrolled hypertension. Presence of raised intracranial pressure. Cervical spine injury. Predicted difficult laryngoscopy except for all class of MP Grades Any pathology of the oral cavity that will obstruct the insertion of device. Mouth opening Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the intubation time using the two devices. Timepoint: 2 years | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare success rate at first attempt To compare the glottic view using Cormack and Lehane Grading. To compare the hemodynamic response i.e., heart rate and mean arterial B.P. after laryngoscopy and intubation. To Grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices. To compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation. To look for complications like post-extubation blood staining on endotracheal tube and incidence of postoperative sore throatTimepoint: 2yrs | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactAmrin Bader
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU Aligarh
Outcome results
None listed