FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two instruments in wisdom tooth removal

Applications of piezosurgery in disimpaction of mandibular third molars versus conventional ostectomy methods

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/04/013288
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-04-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Impacted lower third molars

Interventions

Intervention1: Piezosurgical unit: Piezosurgical unit and blades were used for extraction of third molar, in 10 patients over a period of 1.5 years for this study purpose, to evaluate the efficiency o

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. All male and female patients with good general health condition. 2. ASA 1 and 2 patients. 3. Patients able and willing to give their own consent. 4. Patients willing for regular follow up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with acute infections at surgical site. 2. Patients unable to provide their own consent. 3. Patients with dense sclerotic bone of mandible. Patients with systemic diseases or hematological conditions such as hemophilia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PainTimepoint: 3,7,14 days postoperative—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Swelling Trismus Paresthesia Time takenTimepoint: 3,7,14 days postoperative—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jyotsna Rajan

Manipal College Of Dental Sciences, Manipal

gadi_mds@rediffmail.com9986455201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026