Skip to content

COST EFFECTIVENESS IN TREATING GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME PATIENTS WITH INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN AS COMPARED TO THERAPEUTIC PLASMA EXCHANGE

Comparative study of efficacy of Plasma Exchange and Intra Venous Immunoglobulin(IVIG)in patients of Guillain Barre Syndrome

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/04/013278
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-04-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- All patients were either Bed ridden and on ventilator support system.

Interventions

Intervention1: THERAPEUTIC PLASMA EXCHANGE: first line treatment for patients of Guillain Barre Syndrome Control Intervention1: INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN: first line treatment for patients of Guillai

Sponsors

Department of Transfusion Medicine PGIMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: GBS patient chosen for the study purpose within four weeks of onset of weakness following Ausbury criteria and ranging from 13 to 60 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Duration of illness more than 30 days before entry in study. 2. Children less than or equal to 12 year of age. 3. Any contraindication for IVIG or TPE. 4. Patient with hypokalemia and porphyria. 5. Specific exclusions with atypical features such as-- a.Purely sensory symptoms. b.Cranial nerve palsies without significant limb weakness. c.Previous acute polyneuropathy. d.Improvement of one or more disability grades before inclusion e.Pregnancy. f. Previous therapy with immunosuppressive drugs other than steroids. g. Previous plasmapheresis / IVIG therapy. h. Patient not willing to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incremental cost per unit recovery in grade of Guillain Barre syndrome disability scoreTimepoint: Time horizon for the study was 12 weeks during which all major effects and costs were assessed and outcome at 12 weeks were measured.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
comparing other tools( MRC SUM SCORE AND ONLS SCORE) for assessment for functional improvement in GBSTimepoint: Time horizon for the study was 12 weeks during which all major effects and costs were assessed and outcome at 12 weeks were measured.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAshish Maheshwari

PGIMER

rrsdoc@hotmail.com7087009482

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026