Comparison of two airway securing techniques for prone surgery under anesthesia

Comparison of laryngeal mask airway inserted in prone position versus routine endotracheal intubation for surgeries .

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/04/013242

Enrollment

Registered

2018-04-13

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Healthy ASA 1and2

Interventions

Intervention1: Airway securing device: Two airway techniques compared for time from induction of anaesthesia to start of surgery, complications, recovery time, cost effectiveness . Control Interventio

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1and 2 patients for prone surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA 3 and 4 ,predicted difficult airway, surgeries in supine position, oral and nasal surgeries, preoperative sore throat.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
LMA technique reduces time from induction to start of surgery and recovery time as compared to ETT techniqueTimepoint: Approximately 10 min reduction in induction to start of surgery time, around 5 min reduction in recovery time	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
costeffectiveness with LMA technique due to reduction in Anaesthesia timeTimepoint: 15 min reduction	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactArwinder pal singh

Punjab institute of medical sciences

arwin79@yahoo.co.in9888083994

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026