FindTrial
Sign In

Compare The Two Different Methods That Mainly Helps In Bringing The Gums In Cleft Defect Closer And Giving The Nose A Normal Look In Babies

Comparative Study Of Nasoalveolar Molding By Grayson Method And Dynacleft With Nasal Elevator In Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip And Palate Patients- A Clinical Prospective Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/04/013240
Enrollment
16
Registered
2018-04-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Healthy

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparing the two methods i.e Dynacleft with nasal elevator and Grayson technique of nasoalveolar molding: Comparative Study Of Nasoalveolar Molding By Grayson Method And Dynacleft With

Sponsors

Dr BA Abhinav
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip And Palate Healthy patient without any systemic diseases. ï?§

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients more than 4 months of age. Less Patient Motivation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measure The Changes In The Alveolar Cleft Gap And Nasal ChangesTimepoint: Weekly have to access the changes—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr BA Abhinav

Institute Of Dental Studies And Technologies

drpuneetbatra@gmail.com9810335961

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026