A comparative analysis to study the effect of amniotic (placental) membrane in patients with gingival recession with and without using magnification glasses.

Coronally advanced flap with amniotic membrane for the treatment of gingival recessions using conventional macrosurgical approach and microsurgical loupes- a comparative analysis.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/04/013134

Enrollment

Registered

2018-04-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- localised gingival recession

Interventions

Intervention1: test: Coronally advanced flap with amniotic membrane using microsurgical loupes Control Intervention1: control: Coronally advanced flap with amniotic membrane in conventional approach

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age: >=18 years 2. Presence of Miller class I or II recession ( >2mm in depth at buccal aspect of teeth) 3. Absence of any systemic condition that would interfere with healing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Recession defects associated with caries, deep abrasions or restorations 2. Active gingival and periodontal disease. 3. Teeth with excessive root prominence. 4. Smokers. 5. Poor oral hygiene

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Amount of root coverage in terms of width and depth. Timepoint: 3,6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Increase in the width of keratinized gingiva. Clinical attachment level. Patient satisfaction analysis. Timepoint: 3, 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr GautamiSPenmetsa

vishnu dental college

gautamipenmetsa@gmail.com9951011618

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026