FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two treatment techniques for neck pain.

Comparison of Immediate Effects of Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization with Thoracic Manipulation on Range of Motion and Pain in Patients with Mechanical Neck Pain.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/04/013088
Enrollment
42
Registered
2018-04-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Mechanical Neck Pain

Interventions

Intervention1: Cervicothoracic Junction Mobilization: Direction specific mobilization to cervicothoracic junction according to primary movement restriction. Grade of glides will be decided on basis of

Sponsors

Nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with primary complaint of neck pain, having cervicothoracic junction hypomobility Moderate to severe intensity of pain (more than or equal to 4/10 on NPRS)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Recent significant trauma Radiculopathy Myelopathy Malignancy Severe Headaches Fractures of spine or upper limbs Metabolic disease History of cervical or thoracic spine surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cervical Range of Motion with CROM deviceTimepoint: Before allocation of group Half an hour after intervention—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain intensity on NPRSTimepoint: Before allocation of group Half an hour after intervention—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShriya Joshi

School of Allied Health Sciences, MAHE

ganesh.bm@manipal.edu9448263631

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026