FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two different techniques for insertion of tube while doing nasal intubation

Cuff inflation technique versus use of magill forcep for nasotracheal intubation under direct laryngoscopy.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/04/013025
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-04-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA 1 and 2

Interventions

Intervention1: Cuff inflation technique: Technique to be used while introduction of tube from oropharynx to glottic for doing nasotracheal intubation under direct laryngoscopy till appearance of first

Sponsors

Ami Bhayani
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients posted for elective surgeries requiring general anesthesia and nasotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Known airway anomaly, Nasal pathology, Anticipated difficult intubation, Presence of upper respiratory infection, cough, bleeding disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy of cuff inflation technique in nasal intubation without injury to oropharyngeal structures. Timepoint: At the time just after tube is passed through glottic opening—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy of cuff inflation technique in preventing injury to cuff of endotracheal tube and in doing intubation in patients with reduced mouth opening and with difficult airway.Timepoint: Just after extubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAmi Bhayani

Medical College Baroda

patwaapeksha@gmail.com9879540828

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026