Skip to content

comparison between flouride varnish and chlorhexidine varnish on mutans streptococci growth

Comparative Evaluation of Dental Caries Status and Anti Microbial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine-Thymol Varnish and Fluoride Varnish in School Children of Bangalore City

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/03/012899
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-03-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: cervitec plus(chlorhexidine-thymol varnish): Application of varnish will be done at base line,3rd month AND 6th month intervals Control Intervention1: Duraphat(fluoride varnish): Applic

Sponsors

Dr Dukkireddy Divya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children of age 6-10 years with [dmft and DMFT score of 4-5] Children free of any systemic diseases Children whose parents give consent for the procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with disability Children taking xylitol chewing gums/undergone any fluoride treatment Children who had received anti-microbial therapy in the previous 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
evaluation of anti microbial efficacy of varnishes over a period of one yearTimepoint: one year(evaluation of anti microbial efficacy of varnishes at base line, 3rd month,6th month and 12th month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of dental caries outcome at 12th monthTimepoint: One year

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDukkireddy Divya

Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences

drsmithabk@gmail.com9880577585

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026