FindTrial
Sign In

Autologous platelet rich plasma technique in large macular holes

Comparative study to analyse outcomes of Inverted ILM flap technique vs Autologous platelet rich plasma technique vs Conventional ILM Peeling in large macular holes - PRP

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/03/012798
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-03-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Macular hole in retina with size more than 600 microns

Interventions

Intervention1: Autologous platelet rich plasma technique: Blood is taken from the patient and subjected to centrifugation twice to separate the platelet rich plasma. After the steps as in Internal Lim

Sponsors

Aravind Eye Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Macular hole more than 600 microns

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Minimum diameter > 1500 µ 2. Secondary causes like traumatic macular hole, myopic macular holes, postoperative / iatrogenic macular holes 3. Other ocular pathologies affecting vision 4. Past history of any vitreo-retinal surgery 5. Any systemic infection including HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Anatomical closure as shown by Ocular coherence tomographyTimepoint: 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional improvement i.e. improvement in visual acuityTimepoint: 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNaresh Babu

Aravind Eye Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology

cauveryeye@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026