FindTrial
Sign In

A Study comparing two Airway device LMA Proseal and LMA Supreme in laproscopic cholecystectomy

Clinical evaluation and intracuff pressure monitoring of LMA Proseal versus LMA Supreme during elective laproscopic cholecystectomy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/03/012665
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-03-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA1 and ASA2

Interventions

Intervention1: Clinical evaluation and intracuff monitoring of LMA ProSeal versus LMA Supreme: We have compared LMA ProSeal and LMA Supreme in anaesthetised patients with respect to ease of insertion,

Sponsors

Mridula pawar head of department
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Normal Airway ASA1 and ASA2 Weight 30-70 kg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Difficult Airway, mouth opening <2.5 cm, history of Upper respiratory tract infection in previous 10 days, Obesity, intestinal pathology, esophageal pathology, cervical spine pathology, pregnancy,edentulous

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Placement of both device is easy and simple. LMA proseal provides better seal pressure.both devices provide similar fiber-optic bronchoscopic view. Intracuff pressure of LMA Proseal was higher than LMA supreme. More frequent deflation of air should be done for LMA Proseal.Timepoint: 04/03/2014—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Both devices have minimal intraoperative and postoperative complicationsTimepoint: Intraoperative and postoperative—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShilpee kumari

VMMC and safdarjung hospital

guptapdnb@yahoo.co.in8130896905

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026