Health Condition 1: null- To compare SHAPE and ASAPS scores in assessment of physical status, identification of anaesthesia related risk factors, resource management and their correlation with perioperative events.
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Pranit Patil
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Any patient scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia, sedation or monitored anaesthesia care.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients under 15 years of age
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Correlation of Silverman-Holt Aggregate Preoperative Evaluation (SHAPE) and American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA PS) preoperative evaluation systems grades and intraoperative, postoperative complications, blood loss, requirement of ventilatory support, length of ICU stay etcTimepoint: SHAPE and ASA PS scores were assigned preoperatively. Complications, blood loss, reqiurement of ventilatory support, ICU length of stay etc were noted at the time of discharge | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| SHAPE and ASAPS grades were applied to each patient. They were shown to in-charge anaesthesiologist of that particular case. His/Her opinion regarding both scoring systems was taken in the form of questionnaire after the surgery.Timepoint: Scores were applied preoperatively. Attending anaesthesiologists opinion was taken at the end of the case. | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactPranit Patil
Lokmanya Tilak municipal medical college and general hospital, Sion, Mumbai.
Outcome results
None listed